Posts Tagged ‘8.2’

“Where Your God Ends and My God Begins”: Why We Like It

Monday, November 7th, 2011

Volunteer Chris Koslowski is secretly really good at flag football. We’ve seen him play, and let us tell you: He runs the best hitch-and-go we’ve ever seen, and dude can catch, too—he has hands like Spiderman, only stickier. Rumor has it, in fact, that Chris turned down the chance to be Mark Wahlberg’s body double in Invincible to pursue a graduate degree in creative writing and join our staff of volunteers here at CR. And we’re very happy to have him—he’s a sharp evaluator of manuscripts and a tireless applier of postcard labels. He chest-bumps us every time we make a good copy edit, which hurt at first, but now that we come to work wearing protective padding, we kind of like it.

Here’s Chris on one of the stories from our upcoming issue:

Chris Koslowski: I’ve had more than a few religious figures in my life tell me that God does indeed answer every prayer, just not always in the way we expect. In Scott Kaukonen’s “Where Your God Ends and My God Begins,” a prayer is answered, but the liberty God (or fate, or whatever chaotic principle governs this pale blue marble of ours) takes in his/her reply would make even a holy man squirm.

After years of doctor visits, false hope, and prayer so intense that two knee-shaped spots are clearly worn into the carpet at the foot of her bed, Maggie, an American missionary worker in Uganda, discovers she is pregnant. Her husband, Elliot, is waiting in the States for the end of his wife’s long absence. Her lover, Andrew, who manages the field clinic for which Maggie volunteers, is a Catholic priest.

Kaukonen recognizes that Maggie’s story has little room for certainty. Is her pregnancy a curse or a blessing? A sin or a miracle? Would Elliot, if he had a say, welcome or condemn the product of his wife’s infidelity? Kaukonen expertly blurs the boundaries of right and wrong, choice and fate, and even Maggie’s own sense of logic. To counter the karmic debt accrued through the sin of her child’s conception, Maggie turns to another priest, the physically imposing yet gentle Marcus, who risks his reputation to protect her with a mysterious ritual that smacks of the supernatural. Over the course of their weekly meetings, the weave of contradictions that defines this story grows more intricate. Is Marcus pious or pagan? Wise or wicked?

Kaukonen keeps readers moving through his layered narrative with near perfect expositional timing. The moment information feels needed, Kaukonen provides it while subtly assembling his next mystery and hinting at turns far down the road. He builds to a compelling series of reveals which prove that ambiguity can be more satisfying than truth, and that a successful twist isn’t a twist at all, but the completion of an arc the reader had yet to fully understand. Most impressive of all, “Where Your God Ends and My God Begins” resists classification. Is it a domestic drama set half a world away? A slow-burning, escalating thriller with a roller coaster’s worth of stomach-wrenching turns and drops? The story combines elements we’ve all seen into something that’s tough to put a finger on. When I’m finished, I want to read it again. And that’s why I like it.

“The Jesus Party”: Why We Like It

Monday, October 3rd, 2011

We’re excited about our new issue, due out in January (a bit behind schedule, but we promise it’s worth the wait). We think you should be, too. To help you achieve maximum anticipatory excitement, Assistant Editor Becky Adnot-Haynes wrote a brief teaser for one of our forthcoming stories, Kate Finlinson’s “The Jesus Party.”

Becky Adnot-Haynes: It’s only been two weeks since I began work as one of CR’s new assistant editors, but I’ve already had a bunch of great experiences on the job. Some things I’ve done so far:

  • Directed a wayward freshman to the correct building on campus after he inquired as to how to reach the fifth floor of our three-stories-plus-a-basement building.
  • Managed, after a modest struggle, to open a submission envelope mummified with tape.  Submitters, we know that you don’t want your manuscript to get lost in the mail, but if you want us to read it, we must be able to open the envelope.
  • Learned that fiction editor Michael Griffith has not, contrary to popular opinion, begun gelling his hair—he just sometimes gets caught in the rain.

I’ve also read some excellent fiction and poetry. I’m particularly taken with Kate Finlinson’s short story “The Jesus Party,” in which the unnamed narrator who has been recently hired as a costumed performer for theme parties—he’s been a pirate, a ninja, and a magician, he tells us—is asked to assume the most important identity of them all: the Holy One himself, Jesus Christ.

The story is a statement on the middle class’s commodification of Jesus Christ. Even though Mrs. Lowe, perfectly coiffed wife and mother, admits that she doesn’t actually believe in God, she seems unbothered by the prospect of presenting him as light entertainment for her five-year-old daughter and her friends. Moreover, she is pleased with the authenticity of the narrator’s beard, and even furnishes him with specific God-like behaviors to perform, entreating him to “speak softly” and “kneel most of the time.” Fittingly, she provides him with bags of Swedish Fish to pass out as treats among the party guests. There’s no better time to believe in Jesus, the narrator tells us wryly, than when you’re a kid—when he can fit in with the cast of characters you see on television and on the fronts of cereal boxes.

And yet I get the impression that performing Jesus Christ isn’t only about a paycheck for the narrator; that he doesn’t quite believe in his own self-effacing disdain. It’s about living during a time, postcollege and precareer, when “you’re convinced you’re not yet really you.” It’s about the loves he has and hasn’t had, ghosts of women who hang around the pages of the story. And it’s about his own salvation—or lack thereof. “I was born into godlessness,” he tells us, “and nothing . . . could wrangle me away from this position. When I was a kid my mom explained it to me. ‘Some families believe in God,’ she said. ‘But ours doesn’t.’ I didn’t think about it much beyond that.” Until the birthday girl, Stella Lowe, asks him if the world is coming to an end. We get the impression that he, too, would like to hear someone’s answer to her question.

“The Burn”: Why We Like It

Monday, August 22nd, 2011

Dietrik's driver's license photo.

CR staff member Dietrik Vanderhill is Dutch. Like, wore-wooden-shoes-to-hometown-parades-in-Iowa Dutch. Like, grew-up-in-a-house-his-father-built-himself Dutch. Like, every-angle-on-his-body-is-precisely-90-degrees Dutch. You could set your watch on the man’s chin were in not covered by a large, bushy beard the color of fall leaves.

Last Monday, Dietrik came into our office in a state of severe agitation. He was struggling to come up with a way to describe why, exactly, Craig Davidson’s “The Burn” (from our current issue) was so compelling a story. Then Dietrik started plucking individual hairs from his beard and shaping them into letters, which he then glued to scrap paper. The following is a transcription of his wiry red missive.

Dietrik Vanderhill: For this post, I’m tempted to write a recommendation for “The Current State of the Universe,” winner of the Robert and Adele Schiff Award in Prose (in the latest issue of CR). This romping story by Theodore Wheeler follows one employee of a company called Make Things Right, Inc., a sort of karmic revenge business. The whole story is framed as a lecture by James Dandrow (the narrator) to a new recruit:

It’s simple. You cut someone off in traffic, flip him the bird, and in the morning the gate is open and your dog has run away. It isn’t a coincidence. It’s us. We’re the Furies of the modern world—the vengeance of a god gone corporate. . . .  A big part of this job is having faith that the world is better because of us, that we must sometimes act against humanity in order to preserve a state of equilibrium. But occasionally a case goes so obviously wrong that it calls the whole system into question.

But a story with passages like this—along with such a provocative concept—can easily sell itself. It provides a direct, satisfying approach to “fixing” the world’s ills, albeit on a small scale. Yet while James Dandrow discovers that pumping more malice into the system isn’t the answer all of the time (only most of the time), another story in this Cincinnati Review issue probes a bit deeper into similar territory.

Why are we attracted to destruction? “The Burn” by Craig Davidson tries to answer that. The story finds our narrator, a 23-year-old soldier discharged from the Marines after being deployed in Iraq, trying to readjust to civilian life while driving a school bus in Niagara Falls. Sections jump among three story lines: the narrator’s time in Iraq, his immediate return to the States, and his current bus-driving life. The lack of smooth transitions heightens the contrast of these juxtaposed worlds. More serious in tone than Wheeler’s, Davidson’s story gives us evils that cannot be avenged with tasteful, light vandalism. A teenage girl’s body and spirit are disfigured by cancer; an undiscovered landmine explodes a military latrine truck and dismembers its driver; a camel spider decapitates a mouse; Occidental Chemical insidiously dumps toxic waste into the Niagara. Over the course of the story, the narrator distills these miseries down to their elements (sometimes down to sentence fragments) as he, along with his bunk mate Merryweather, experience war at the microscopic level. He puzzles over why a spider is “just full of goo, like some carnivorous bath bead,” and he fights the hours of heat and tedium in the desert: “Sweat pooling in my eye sockets. Checkpoint 86K. A cement pillbox bordering a bone-white road. That was my home for eleven months.”

Do not expect this narrator to give you a contextual overview of the Middle East or offer the lens of military analysis. Instead, he conveys his world in the precise, palpable details that inspire both surprise and dread. The characters’ motivations reveal themselves piecemeal as the narrator seeks out a complex friendship with one of the students riding his bus, Bree (the daughter of a Gulf War vet, Cedric), because he recognizes that Bree chases the “burn” of a life with cancer in the same way that Merryweather was “chasing the burn,” or the inevitability of destruction, in Iraq.

So why are these soldiers (and by extension, the rest of us) drawn to destruction? “The Burn” asks us to think harder before driving toward it, especially when it seems like the only direction to go.