Posts Tagged ‘8.1’

Bonus Material: Pierce, Chitwood, Cohen

Friday, September 16th, 2011

In their waxing and waning, seasons are like radio signals, and as we climbed toward our McMicken Hall office this morning, the forty-nine-degree air was a cold static on our naked forearms, calves, and flip-floppeted feet. People smug in their jeans and windbreakers were giving us impertinent looks. Once inside, we ransacked the CR’s desk drawers and file cabinets, hoping for a left-behind sweatshirt nothing had nested in, but unfortunately all the left-behind sweatshirts had been nested in—by mice, spiders, Lit PhDs, etc.

Then we turned up these three comments from contributors talking about poems in the current issue, and though we didn’t feel any less underdressed, we realized there are other ways of making do when the temp. starts to drop for good.

Catherine Pierce: When I was younger, I spent many long summer days imagining the life I would someday live. Those daydreams were often the best parts of my days, because the experiences I imagined having were, I was sure, much richer and more exotic than anything I could experience at home (I will be a world traveler and learn seven languages! No, I will live in a cabin without electricity and spend my days hiking unforgiving terrain! No, I will somehow develop artistic talent and be a painter!). There’s a particular rush that accompanies this type of wide-open-future imagining, and in “Dear Self I Might Have Been” I wanted to explore what might happen if that rush of almost, of will be, of soon, were pursued obsessively and indefinitely.

Michael Chitwood: I went to a scout camp on a small lake for several summers as a kid. During the day, the dock area was all shout and shove, splash and knock; the oars thunking in the oar locks. It was good ruckus. But I would wander back to the dock in the late evening when all the gear had been stowed. It was quiet, but you could still feel the potential energy of the place. The memory of that was how the poem got started, and, as with many of my poems, I had no idea where it would go from there. “At the Dock at Dusk” was a surprise for me. I consider it as a good sign when language takes its own turn.

Bruce Cohen: For what seemed like a hundred years, going to the beach was work: eagle-eyeing my three boys to make sure nobody drowned, or consumed too much sand, or stood too close to the edge of the gangplank of breakers, or sliced their feet on barnacles, or buried each other alive. . . . Of course, in this exhausting chaos of my own ineptitude I couldn’t be too concerned with the way they disrupted the enjoyment of other families. On those days, all I ever daydreamed about was one relaxing afternoon where I could simply read and snooze and not be bothered. And that, in fact, happened: All of a sudden the boys were grown and had no interest in going to the beach with us, but I found myself watching strangers’ children, walking out to the breakers myself, contemplating the large issues of life, death, generational disappointments, evolution—what is, in fact, missing from our lives. And in composing “Beach Day,” I know I was thinking about that Philip Larkin poem about going to the beach, and that resigned sadness and sense of loss and never-coming-back seemed to infiltrate my poem as well.

“Not Even Lions and Tigers”: Why We Like It

Thursday, August 11th, 2011

CR volunteer Brian Trapp is haunted. If you see him from a distance, you might think the noxious-looking cloud wafting behind him is indicative of a Pigpen-like stench, but really Brian smells okay (a bit like cashews, actually). The emanations trailing him like a comet’s gaseous tail are, in fact, [booming voice here] HIS DEMONS. Because he leads a cursed existence, we feel sorry for the guy, which is why we overlook it when Brian mutters darkly over his shoulder, burns the hair off his arm with his lighter, or drinks so much at parties that he loses skin tone.

Considering his plague-o-phantasms, it’s no surprise that when Brian picked a piece from our current issue to write on for the blog, he chose Steve Amick’s “Not Even Lions and Tigers,” a ghost story rooted in the actual and factual—with a throng of done-wrong souls that makes Brian’s own spectral assemblage seem like so many annoying uncles.

Brian Trapp: The premise of “Not Even Lions and Tigers” is the kind that I enjoy most: The seemingly fantastic is only a slight exaggeration from the absurd truth. Steve Amick’s main character and narrator, Harry Bennett, was a real-life executive of the Ford Motor Company. A former boxer, sailor, and all around street-tough, Bennett was “discovered” at a bar fight and eventually put in charge of the Ford Service Department, a clandestine and violent organization (part mob, part CIA) entrusted with busting unions and “settling” labor disputes, if you know what I mean. The man had a lot of enemies and was more than a little paranoid. He built immense fortifications dubbed “The Lodge” and “The Castle,” complete with dynamited moats, secret passageways, caches of arms and ammunition, escape routes, and, yes, lions and tigers.

Harry Bennett's Castle

While anyone can learn these things about Harry Bennett, Steve Amick takes the historical details and gives us back something even stranger and more wonderful. Told in a disarming free-indirect style, the story begins with Bennett convinced “his hunting lodge now had a full-blown infestation of haints.” He’s not sure who these ghosts are, but suspects that they’re some of the union agitators he’s snuffed out around the property. He flees from one stronghold to the other, but the haints follow. In comic escalation, Bennett squirms, going to greater lengths to disavow responsibility.

One of many moments that made me laugh out loud occurs as Bennett takes a bath to unwind. He hears one of the haints say, “Sou-oopp . . . !” Bennett thinks: “No one was turning up the boil on Harry Herbert Bennett, thank you very much. He would not be ingredients. Not today.” The story is full of moments like this. Amick renders Bennett as comic and pathetic without demeaning him, a skillful balancing act. In one poignant moment, Bennett recounts his “big break” meeting Henry Ford and teeters into self-pity, thinking of his younger self: “Before he knows it, it’s his life and maybe he’s kind of lost his way.”

With its well-crafted unreliable narrator, the story treads the line between paranoia and the paranormal, as any good ghost story should. I won’t be “that guy” who ruins the ending for everyone who hasn’t read it, but as Bennett makes his final dash, Amick ends with these fantastic lines: “He wished there wasn’t a moon tonight. Big bare bulb of a moon, looking down at him like that. Big know-it-all moon.” Bennett can’t hide, and neither can we.

Through Bennett, Amick shows how our conscience can manifest in mysterious ways. The piece is political without being overbearing or reductive, and in blending fact and fiction, it demonstrates that truth is not stranger than fiction, but equally strange.

In this spirit, after you finish reading this story, I recommend a family field trip to the outskirts of Farwell and Ann Arbor, where (clutching your Cincinnati Review) you can view both the Lodge and the Castle and re-enact Bennett’s flight from the “haints.” I’m slated to go at the end of August. Maybe I’ll see you there.

Bonus Material: Sweeney, Beebe, Russ

Thursday, July 28th, 2011

More from our contributors on their work in our current issue—volume 8, number 1. We’re struck by how these three poets approach dailiness. Through lavish contemplation of common objects, events, or experiences, they enliven and enrich what often falls under our radar.

Chad Sweeney: I’ve written a series of poems with place names for titles in which the narrator personifies some aspect of that place, including Istanbul, Michigan, Bolivia, Chicago, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Paris, California. The poem “Los Angeles” imagines a poet (or someone who once thought of himself as a poet) caught in commuter traffic on the way to his commercial job in Los Angeles. I haven’t seen much poetry written in this landscape, the commuter’s highway, yet it is the daily reality for so many people living in the outer rings of urban sprawl. I think one of poetry’s challenges is to claim the “unpoetic” for its materials: elevator, shopping mall, office space, fax machine, and parking lot. I wrote the poem while living in Michigan, yet ironically I’ll be navigating that freeway sprawl east of Los Angeles when I begin teaching at Cal State, San Bernardino, in the fall of 2011.

Cindy Beebe: During a poetry workshop I attended a few years ago, I was privileged to hear B. H. Fairchild speak of “the too-muchness of the world” and how it must be given voice. I couldn’t agree more. Always, and everywhere, especially in mundane places, I find there is something a bit “too much” to ignore, some fact or aspect that endears, or surprises, or in some way begs my attention—for example, the time my father pulled me aside and declared that my aunt had a naked man in her garage. I knew immediately that a poem, which eventually became “My Aunt Has a Naked Man in Her Garage,” was coming.

Don Russ: I’ve come to think that anything looked at closely enough becomes everything—or at least begins to reveal kinship with everything—in my world.  Both “Girl with Gerbil” and “Reunion” grew out of autobiographical material I’d earlier recorded in notebooks. When at some point I sat down to think and to try to make them into a poem, each episode eventually began to breathe my deepest preoccupations: childhood and identity, relationships, questions about the very nature of reality and its relationship to human perception and creativity. To some degree they both became poems about art, about poetry itself.