Archive for the ‘Games’ Category

Game of the Month: Everyone’s a Winner!

Monday, April 16th, 2012

While we were busy collating proofs for our upcoming issue, many of you were busy composing fabulous entries for our Premise Wars.

The winner? All of you. We liked your ideas so much, in fact, that we’re sorry we didn’t think of it first: a Pulitzer Prize–winning marathon runner who comes back as a mummy and becomes confused about the ethics of eating sentient vegetables.

Email us at editors@cincinnatireview.com to claim your choice of free back issue, CR slingpack, or CR thermos. And thanks for participating!

The _________ Is……..

Wednesday, December 7th, 2011

Our Game of the Month was a popular one. A lot of you enjoy the grammar-based creativity of Mad Libs, and we were _____________ on the floor of the office as we read the entries. Snopes.com, Pomeranians, yodeling? All awesome. (Even better when we think about the Snopes.com debunking of the yodeling Pomeranian chain email.)

We’re feeling generous at this time of the year (after all, yesterday was both St. Nick’s Day and Microwave Oven Day), so we’re giving you the gift of the Cincinnati Review. If you’re one of the adept wordsmiths who tickled our ______, you’ve won! Please email editors [at] cincinnatireview [dot] com to claim your prize (thermos, slingpack, or issue of choice).

Game of the Month Results

Friday, November 18th, 2011

We’re hard at work proofreading the new issue (due out in January!), but in between bursts of intense, disturb-me-not concentration, we’ve been enjoying the captions you all have proposed for the photo posted in our Game of the Month.  Laxatives, kegel exercises, mannequins: what more could we have asked for?

We can determine whether “which” or “that” is correct in a particular sentence, but we’re stymied by the task of picking just one winner—because you’re all so good!  Perhaps we’re suffering from decision fatigue . . .

So, you’re all winners! If you are Cornelius Speckle; Tabitha Rae Barenblum; Prof. Michel Musselhands; Dan Peterson, Master Brewer; Illah R. Nourbakhsh, Robotics Engineer; Garrison Hearst; Linda Flavonoid; Charlie Green; Douglas; Jessica Gama; or Lawrence Cady, please email editors [at] cincinnatireview [dot] com to claim your prize (thermos, slingpack, or issue of choice). Thanks for playing!

Game of the Month: Guidance for Guidelines

Monday, October 10th, 2011

We’re so excited about our new online submissions system that we can’t stop celebrating. Not with alcohol—that’s not our style—but with lots and lots of sugar. We’ve consumed rafts of Laffy Taffy, Bottle Caps, and those hard candies that resemble (sort of) strawberries, and we’ve taken to singing the Willy Wonka soundtrack and miming exaggerated falls into a turbulent chocolate river.

Lisa Ampleman has built a small popsicle-stick structure in one corner of the office that she refers to as her Shrine to Skittles, and Becky Adnot-Haynes is threatening to order a gross of those fluffy orange fake peanuts. Obviously a big distraction is in order so that we are not drawn still deeper into the cavity-filled maw of the god of sucrose. To bring us back from the brink, we have devised a new Game of the Month! Due to the new online submission system, we updated our guidelines, and we want to hear YOUR suggestions for appropriate submission guidelines for a lit mag. What do you think we should be asking for? “Desperately seeking epic poems about sea crustaceans”? “Only your best short-shorts about girls in short-shorts”? “Please affix three paper clips on each side of your manuscript to prevent unseemly paper flappage”?

The composer of the best guidelines submitted by next Monday, October 17, will receive a Cincinnati Review–branded thermos or slingpack (which we’ll send through the U.S. Postal Service and not through the inter-webs). To enter, simply post your comments on the blog by clicking the post title above. Happy submitting!

Game of the Month: Editing Test

Wednesday, September 21st, 2011

Here at CR we have an arduous training process for our new volunteers. We ask them to perform feats of physical strength and stamina, like doing sprints with heavy stacks of the current issue on their heads and standing atop a teeny platform for a really, really long time (the latter we stole from Survivor, but we think it’s important for our purposes, too). After that we test their balance and reflexes by having them walk a nine-foot-high balance beam while dodging banana peels and sandwich crusts left over from our lunches.

After they’re sufficiently covered in residual banana goo, we ask them to do still more rigorous things like opening the mail, juggling information within our various databases, and of course, processing submissions. They also participate in meetings about editing, production, marketing, and advanced paper-cut avoidance.

If they make it that far, we ask them to take our editing test, so they can judge their aptitudes for things like spelling, grammar, and judicious rephrasing. And now, readers, we’re inviting you to join the fun! (Balance beam excluded.)  Take a gander at a small portion of our test below and correct the punctuation and grammar problems. The first five people to answer all correctly will get to choose a prize (free issue, free thermos, or free slingback—all emblazoned with CR’s handsome logo).

Submit your answers via comment by next Wednesday, September 28. We’ll close the contest either on that date or upon receiving five sets of correct answers. To comment, just click on the post title above.

One more thing: We think your editing skills should come from within—sort of like the samurai spirit in martial arts movies—so we ask that you take the test without consulting the Internet. (Besides, do you want to find out how good your editing skills are, or do you want to spend the next hour scouring grammar message boards? Hmm? Hmm?)

Editing Test

Correct the punctuation and grammar problems in the following sentences.  Note that some sentences may be correct (we’re tricky like that).

  1. Tamar had grown up on a little, native, banana plantation.
  2. Jeff wasn’t feeling well so he went home and laid down.
  3. The situation is grim but, if we are prepared to act promptly, there is still one chance for escape.
  4. The gates swung apart, the bridge fell, the portcullis was drawn up.
  5. He is one of the ablest scientists who has attacked this problem.
  6. Among the five Gerry Bryant is the candidate, whom we hope will win.
  7. The ranger offered Shirley and him advice on several campsites.
  8. Surely, you’ve heard the phrase, “Keeping up with the Jones’s?”

Game of the Month: Cover Letters

Wednesday, May 4th, 2011

Though we read cover letters with interest here at CR, they don’t really play a part in our decision-making process. Cover letters are kind of like internal organs. You don’t think too much about them unless they’re bloated or causing you pain. Sometimes we’ll receive cover letters in which authors try to sell us on a submission or explain the social import of their work (“My wrenching tale of an agave-harvesting desert hermit who nurses a mistrustful, snake-bitten coyote interrogates the conflicts and complications arising in the post-capitalist global marketplace”), or they’ll claim their work will change our lives (in the same manner the inventors of  The Clapper© promised to change our lives but could never live up to the impossible dreams their infomercials engendered in our hopeful, longing bosoms). Of course, we would never dismiss a submission based on a silly cover letter, but we will admit, sometimes these hyperbolic efforts do bring us joy—especially the ones that come with photos and illustrations. In honor of the deep-down happiness a truly goofy cover letter provides, we invite you draft for us your most bombastic attempts at the genre. Make us impossible promises. Tell us it was your fiction, and not Jonas Salk, that rid America of Polio. Explain why your poems about losing your virginity in an Applebee’s restroom demonstrates the decadence and cultural decay of Western civilization better than The Wasteland.

Send us your imaginary cover letters, and we’ll award logo–emblazoned thermoses or slingpacks to our winners next week. To enter, simply post your comments on the blog by clicking the post title above. (Due to the volume of spam we receive, we have to approve each comment individually, so bear with us as we upload your entry.)

Game of the Month

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

REJECT REJECTION!

Attribute it to post-AWP punchiness, but for this month’s contest, we’re going to try something a little risky. At the mag, we’re all writers too, which is to say we’ve all been rejected, numerous times, which is to say we know well the lowering moment of finding a form response in the mailbox’s mournful maw—or the inbox’s sorrowful cybercircuitry. That last bit of overripe ridiculousness should set the tone for the contest, whose purpose is to dull rejection’s power to pierce us. Basically, we want you to devastate us with your own worst rejection note—one you make up. No actual, real-life rejections, please, because that is just going to make us feel crappy.

Especially if they are from us, because contrary to popular myth, we don’t enjoy rejecting submissions. In fact, we die a little every time we do it, and none of us has slept in years.

So send us you best imaginary rejection letters, and we’ll award logo–emblazoned thermoses or slingpacks to our winners next week. To enter, simply post your comments on the blog by clicking the post title above. (Due to the volume of spam we receive, we have to approve each comment individually, so bear with us as we upload your entry.)