Archive for the ‘Games, Contests, & Diversions’ Category

Word Without End in Cincinnati

Wednesday, April 18th, 2012

We’re pleased to announce that The Cincinnati Review is sponsoring the third annual Word Without End reading in Cincinnati, a three-hour open-mic marathon, from 6-9 p.m. on Saturday, May 12.

We’ll convene in the biergarten at Christy’s in Clifton, where there will be sustenance and suds a-plenty. Past highlights: naughty PowerPoint presentations, Justin Bieber tribute bands, and readings with props. Join us for a yammery, jammery evening of rapidfire entertainment (10-minute time limit per act).

This cross-genre extravaganza is open to University of Cincinnati students, faculty, staff, and people from the community who want to perform something related to this year’s theme: Aspiration. (Aspiration: 1. the act of aspirating (blowing), 2. the withdrawal by means of suction of fluids from the body, 3. a strong desire.)

Special guest Margaret Luongo (Miami University) will read her fiction. Email editors@cincinnatireview.com to sign up or for more information, and see you in the biergarten!

Game of the Month: Everyone’s a Winner!

Monday, April 16th, 2012

While we were busy collating proofs for our upcoming issue, many of you were busy composing fabulous entries for our Premise Wars.

The winner? All of you. We liked your ideas so much, in fact, that we’re sorry we didn’t think of it first: a Pulitzer Prize–winning marathon runner who comes back as a mummy and becomes confused about the ethics of eating sentient vegetables.

Email us at editors@cincinnatireview.com to claim your choice of free back issue, CR slingpack, or CR thermos. And thanks for participating!

Profredding: The Fine Art of a Close Eye

Monday, April 9th, 2012

This week, we’re meeting to finish our proofreading, a multi-step process involving the authors, managing editor, poetry and fiction editors, and assistant/associate editors. Each of us gets out our loupe and a brightly-colored pencil, and we pore through 200+ pages of the journal, noting things that would embarrass us if they made it into print (misspelled title! misspelled author name! bio missing! “rhinoceros” repeated twice, accidentally!). Then, in a one- or two-day marathon, we collate all of the changes before sending them off to our typesetter. Accuracy matters to us.

And so for your reading pleasure this week, we offer our proofreading checklist. Despite our careful work and six sets of eyes, something always gets through, so stay tuned for our Blue Pencil Prize in May—you get to be the editor, ex post facto!

Also a reminder: if you want to flex your cranial matter this week, you can still enter our Game of the Month: best premise for a story or poem!

Proofreading Page Proofs:

1) Check back cover, Contents, and Contributors’ Notes for the complete and alphabetical listing of authors’ names. In addition, check for the correct and identical spelling of each author’s name in all three places.

2) Verify that the page numbers on the Contents page match each piece—and that the author’s name on the table of contents is identical to the spelling of the author’s name on his/her piece.

3) Check for widows, orphans, and line breaks (See “Word Division” section of The Chicago Manual of Style). Widows are last line of a paragraph appearing at the top of a page, while orphans are first line appearing at the bottom. Word division is based on pronunciation:  e.g. knowl-edge and prod-uce vs. pro-duce (depending on which word you use).

4) Check for stacking (blocks of three or more repeated words).

5) Check for rivers (distracting flows of white space). Not so relevant anymore since the norm is just one space after a period.

6) Check for absence of correct ligatures (characters that have been created to solve extra kerning between some letters, like f ling instead of fling) or presence of forced ligatures (when designers mess with a typesetting program that allows you to tamper with kerning).

7) Check the verso and recto of the running foot (title or name should appear with the exception of the title page of each piece) and make sure that the page numbers are correctly listed.

8 ) Compare discrete elements of text (e.g., title tags, subtitles, epigraphs, and dedications). Hold up one piece to another and make sure that the typography and spacing/format match.

9) Check that spreads align: same sink at top but it can vary at bottom (short page or long page). Getting rid of widows or orphans sometimes causes fluctuation in page length.

10) Check tight and loose lines (lines with too many or too few words). If the last line of a paragraph is within an em-space of right margin, mark line flush with margin.

Going, going, gone…

Wednesday, March 14th, 2012

Our T-shirts were a hit at AWP: Pushing , shoving, and literary insults ensued as aspiring and veteran writers alike forgot their manners in trying to snag one of these grammatically-instructive-yet-hip pieces of wearable art.  Which means we’ve only got a few of these babies left—snap one up before they’re gone! Featuring superb artwork by Anne Ferguson.

$20 apiece, including shipping. Small and medium sizes available in the women’s baby-blue ringer tee; unisex café au lait shirts are available in small and large. We’ve only got a few of each, so submit your orders pronto by emailing us at editors@cincinnatireview.com. Payment can be made by credit card over the phone or by mailing a check (please email first to make sure we’ve still got your size).

The Blue Pencil Prize

Monday, February 6th, 2012

A lot of blood, sweat, and tears go into the copy-editing and proofreading of each issue of CR (and mustard . . . we blame associate editor Matt McBride for the mustard stain on our copy of The Chicago Manual of Style). And now that our newest issue is officially available, we want you, readers, to get in on the fun: Did we miss anything? Scour our pages and find one legitimate typo (subject to editorial review) in issue 8.2, and we’ll post the results on our blog.

Leave your comments by clicking the post title above. First five to respond get their choice of free issue, thermos, or slingpack, along with a blue Col-Erase pencil, the old-timey editor’s tool of choice. (We have to warn you: Your friends won’t like it when you return their correspondence with the comma splices corrected).

The _________ Is……..

Wednesday, December 7th, 2011

Our Game of the Month was a popular one. A lot of you enjoy the grammar-based creativity of Mad Libs, and we were _____________ on the floor of the office as we read the entries. Snopes.com, Pomeranians, yodeling? All awesome. (Even better when we think about the Snopes.com debunking of the yodeling Pomeranian chain email.)

We’re feeling generous at this time of the year (after all, yesterday was both St. Nick’s Day and Microwave Oven Day), so we’re giving you the gift of the Cincinnati Review. If you’re one of the adept wordsmiths who tickled our ______, you’ve won! Please email editors [at] cincinnatireview [dot] com to claim your prize (thermos, slingpack, or issue of choice).

Adaptation Speculation

Monday, December 5th, 2011

With the news that HBO will be producing movies based on Faulkner novels, we wonder if poetry will ever be adapted in the same way. PBS recently aired an adapted poem, The Song of Lunch, as part of its Masterpiece Contemporary series. The film is appropriately PBS-style, with British accents (Alan Rickman and Emma Thompson play the two main roles), and deep, unexpressed longings.

But what if HBO were to air an adapted poem? What would fit best alongside Boardwalk Empire, Sex and the City, The Wire, and The Sopranos? Here are our nominations:

Robert Frost’s “Home Burial”: Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks could play the nonromantic couple, giving them a chance to stretch their range and reach for the Emmy. The screenplay would write itself, since the poem’s a dialogue, and a mysterious spade and melodramatic violin music would create a great trailer.

Edna St. Vincent Millay’s “Recuerdo” (“We were very tired, we were very merry— / We had gone back and forth all night on the ferry”): James Franco could dress in drag and eat a pear, and Meryl Streep would be stunning as the “shawl-covered head” at the end of the poem.

Robert Lowell’s “Skunk Hour”: Who doesn’t love a film with skunks in it? Though Pepe le Pew wouldn’t be right for the part of supporting animal, Daniel Craig could play the tormented man who voyeuristically watches for “love-cars” at a look-out point and realizes that his mind’s not right.

What obvious adaptation-ready poems have we missed, blog readers?

Game of the Month: Literary Mad Libs!

Thursday, December 1st, 2011

Remember when, riding in the back of your parents’ old Dodge van, which spewed black noxious smoke and had way too many miles on it and was by all measures totally and completely uncool, you and your older sister used to crouch in the backseat to avoid being spotted by your junior-high classmates? And remember how you used to play Mad Libs to dull the pain when the popular kids pointed and laughed at the FOR SALE sign that your parents insisted on posting prominently in the van’s cracked window, shouting “I’ll give you five dollars!”?

Well, we’re going to re-create this memory for you, minus the crushing shame component. This year our amazing writing program is even more so due to the hiring of Danielle Deulen and Chris Bachelder—and because the latter also happens to be a two-time Cincinnati Review contributor, we’ve selected his work for our literary Mad Lib treatment. (It’s a tribute. Sort of. Anyway, he gave us permission.) So: The following is an excerpt from Chris Bachelder’s “Like Dylan at Newport,” from CR 3.1. In the fashion of Mad Libs, we’ve removed some of the words. Give it your best, most creative shot filling them in—then leave your contest entry as a comment on this post by clicking its title. Winners get the choice of free back issue, CR thermos, or CR slingpack.

The ______ ward is in the basement of the ghetto hospital. Dan Boone and Lester come in through the nonautomatic front door, drunk, smelly, and the lobby is packed, bad news, people have gone and gotten themselves very ______. There’s a lot of ____ing and _____ing. There’s plenty of blood, hardly any ________, looks like. Dan gives the rest of an opened beer to some _______ guy who has what looks like a ________ coming out of his abdomen.

Game of the Month Results

Friday, November 18th, 2011

We’re hard at work proofreading the new issue (due out in January!), but in between bursts of intense, disturb-me-not concentration, we’ve been enjoying the captions you all have proposed for the photo posted in our Game of the Month.  Laxatives, kegel exercises, mannequins: what more could we have asked for?

We can determine whether “which” or “that” is correct in a particular sentence, but we’re stymied by the task of picking just one winner—because you’re all so good!  Perhaps we’re suffering from decision fatigue . . .

So, you’re all winners! If you are Cornelius Speckle; Tabitha Rae Barenblum; Prof. Michel Musselhands; Dan Peterson, Master Brewer; Illah R. Nourbakhsh, Robotics Engineer; Garrison Hearst; Linda Flavonoid; Charlie Green; Douglas; Jessica Gama; or Lawrence Cady, please email editors [at] cincinnatireview [dot] com to claim your prize (thermos, slingpack, or issue of choice). Thanks for playing!

Caption Contest

Wednesday, November 9th, 2011

We hear there’s another magazine out there, one that also publishes fiction and poetry, which apparently stole our idea from about a year ago of having images without captions and then having a contest wherein people then submit comical caption possibilities. We take solace though, since it’s some no-name, obscure magazine. We think it’s called The New Yankee or The New Yorker or something stupid like that. We don’t know. Must be a regional thing, like Mr. Pibb or Chipotle. We can’t imagine they’d have a significant enough readership for anyone to really notice the overlap.

So, in order to reclaim our rightful position as the progenitors of the Caption Contest, we’re having another Caption Contest. The above photograph is from our weekly staff meeting. We don’t know what to say about it. But maybe you do. The writer of the best caption for this photo will win (your choice) a free back issue, CR thermos, or CR slingpack.

Leave your caption as a blog comment. (You have to click on the post title above, then you’ll see the comment box. We get a lot of spam, so you’ll have to wait for the comment to be approved.) Be sure to check back in a week or so to see if you won! Judging will be entirely subjective, flawed, and at our whim.